A while back I posted A system for Approaching the World, my first philosophically oriented post that outlined my view of human nature, how to live a good life, and how I understand our drives, needs, pain and suffering in the world. In that post I shared the metaphysical grounding of this approach which is rooted in tenants of the Christian faith, particularly in a) its articulation of God (the creator) as triune in nature: God as One, but in three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit); and b) that human beings are made in His image (which I take, among other things, to indicate a triune nature in human beings: soul, spirit, body). I’d like to here expand on how I’ve come to view the structure of human beings as isomorphic to that of God.
The key passage that has led me to this understanding is found in the beginning…
Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness: and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
Gensis 1: 26-27
A number of years ago I was reflecting on this passage and
was struck by the realization that it is the trinity talking here with and
within itself. In the decision to make man, and to make man in His image, there
is clear intention to draw the reader to the triune nature of God in the use of
plural language when referencing Him (“Us,” “Our image,” and “Our likeness”).
And it is wholly consistent that if this triune nature of God is centralized
and highlighted in the stated intention to make man in that image, that this
triune nature would be centralized and highlighted in man (who was made in that
triune image). This truth I see with a clear and distinct perception in relation
to the passage.
Simultaneously, while reading this passage I was very much
aware of the different aspects of human nature articulated as soul, spirit, and
body in scripture/ and the distinction between soul and body in philosophy:
Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete, without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
1 Thessalonians 5: 23
Plato’s distinctions between soul and body: The Republic, X, 608ff; Phaedrus (the chariot allegory of the soul).
Descartes distinction between soul and body: Discourse on Method (Part 4); Meditation II (Of the Nature of the Human Mind; and that it is more easily known than the Body).
The distinction between the human soul and body I felt I had clarity on, but the distinction between soul and spirit was more confusing to me. This is in large part due to the manner in which both scripture and philosophy often utilize the two terms interchangeably. Still, I quickly recognized three leads on this front (distinguishing soul from spirit): the first being to look to the relation between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit within the trinity, the second being found in Hebrews 4:12, and the third being to examine the words (as used in Hebrews 4:12 and 1 Thessalonians 5:23) in their Greek roots.
In examining the relation between the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit there are a number of passages that can be examined, yet the most
helpful passages to me are:
Therefore Jesus answered and was saying to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in like manner.
John 5: 19
For I did not speak on My own initiative, but the Father Himself who sent Me has given Me a commandment as to what to say and what to speak.
John 12: 49
“When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify about Me…”
John 15: 26
In each of these passages Jesus (the Son) makes clear that
he is the manifestation here on earth of the will of His Father. The Father is
the one who wills, and He (the Son) is the expression of that will in the
finite, temporal world. We also see that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the
Father and the Son, yet even as the Spirit proceeds from the Son, the Son sends
the Spirit from the Father. There is
an order of authority here which Jesus is careful to follow: The Father wills,
and sends the Spirit with that will to the Son, who empowers the Son to express
that will in the finite, temporal world. And then as Jesus obeys he likewise
sends the spirit back to the Father in adoration and love. And in John 15:26 He
(the Son) sends the Spirit back to the Father with His (the Son’s) will as a
request… that the Father send the Spirit to His (the Son’s) followers to
testify to Him (the Son). As such, the Spirit is the mediating entity between
the Father and the Son. As such, I took the relation between the human soul,
spirit, body to be the same. The soul is the seat of human will, intellect,
authority; the body is the expression of the soul’s will in the finite,
temporal world; the spirit is the mediating force which proceeds from the soul
to the body and then back again to the soul.
Following the second lead about the distinction between soul and spirit I examined the passage in Hebrews:
For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart.
Hebrews 4: 12
Here I found parallels to follow: soul/joints and
spirit/marrow. Considering these relations further I recognized the joint as a
hinge that connects one bone to the next, as the soul is that hinge that
connects the finite to the infinite, the temporal to the eternal, the physical
to the spiritual. And likewise I recognized the marrow of the bone to be that
internal place in which blood cells (the lifeblood of the body) are produced,
as the spirit is the lifeblood of the body empowering it towards its
culminating expression.
Following the third lead in distinguishing the soul from the
spirit (and what the heck, the body too) I looked up definitions for each term.
It appears to me that each definition speaks for itself and generally
corresponds to (or at least does not negate) those distinctions already
discovered in the previous 2 leads:
Psuché (psyché): the soul, life, self, breath/ a) the vital breath, breath of life, b) the human soul, c) the soul as the seat of affections and will, d) the self, e) a human person, an individual. (ψυχή, ῆς, ἡ) [Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine]
Pneuma: wind, breath, spirit/ the vital principle by which the body is animated/ the spirit is that which animates and gives life, the body is of no profit (for the spirit imparts life to it, not the body in turn to the spirit; cf. Chr. Frid. Fritzsche, Nova opuscc., p. 239) (πνεῦμα, ατος, τό) [Part of speech: Noun, Neuter]
Sóma: body, flesh, the physical body; the body of the church.( σῶμα, ατος, τό) [Part of speech: Noun, Neuter]
These are the Greek terms used in Hebrews 4:12, and 1 Thessalonians 5:23 for soul, spirit, and body respectively
One question that might be raised is in relation to the feminine part of speech for the soul (Psuché). The key point in addressing this apparent confusion is in recognizing that the soul is not feminine in relation to the human spirit and body, but rather it is feminine in relation to that which created it (God). This adoption of a feminine part of speech for the human soul highlights the ontological distinction between the two (God and human), and likewise highlights that God’s is a necessary existence while human beings exist in an contingent existence.
So taking all of this into consideration I’ve continued
pondering the interrelation of these three aspects of the human being (soul,
spirit, body), understanding them from the Genesis passage to be isomorphic to
the triune God. And as I pondered their interrelations I began to read
Kierkegaard’s The Sickness Unto Death,
and I found immediate confirmation and alignment of my considerations of the
soul, spirit, body relations as Kierkegaard described the human spirit:
The human being is spirit. But what is spirit? Spirit is the self. But what is the self? The self is a relation which relates to itself, or that in the relation which is its relating to itself. The self is not the relation but the relation’s relating to itself. A human being is a synthesis of the infinite [soul] and the finite [body], of the temporal [body] and the eternal [soul], of freedom and necessity. In short a synthesis. A synthesis is a relation between two terms. Looked at in this way a human being is not yet a self.
In a relation between two things the relation is the third term in the form of a negative unity, and the two relate to the relation, and in the relation to that relation; this is what it is from the point of view of soul for soul and body to be in relation. If, on the other hand, the relation relates to itself, then this relation [spirit] is the positive third, and this is the self.
Kierkegaard, The Sickness Unto Death, p. 43-44
This is a potent and powerful expression of the relation between the soul, spirit, and body. The soul and body are distinct, and the spirit is found in the synthesis between the two.
An example: Much like when a husband and wife get married they create a third entity, the relationship itself, and they are both in relationship to one another and both in relationship to the relationship itself. And the relationship is more than the sum of its parts, you cannot simply add the qualities or strengths of each individual together and generate this… it is rather multiplied and not added. The two together create a third entity that is altogether different. And that third synthesizes the relation of the two, binding them together intensely. Each individual will often act for the good of the relationship (even if it is not what either individual wants), which in turn rewards them with its own benefits. And we call this a spiritual connection between the two, rightfully so… because as the relationship grows it becomes more itself, that is, its spirit is manifest in its relating to itself… and in so doing it unifies the two.
This is how I came to understand the relation between the human soul, spirit, and body. It is by design isomorphic to the triune God and as such, the interrelation of its parts mirror the interrelation among the components of the trinity (Father, Son, Spirit). The human soul is the seat of the will, the intellect, the immortal aspect of humankind that acts as a hinge between the finite and infinite realm, pondering that which is true, noble, right, pure, lovely, and admirable of “the One” and willing that these wonders be expressed in the finite world. The human spirit emanates from the soul as that breath of life in the body, moving it towards that culminating expression. The body, moved by the spirit, works toward the expression of that will (and vision) cast by the soul. And as the body moves as that expression it sends the spirit back to the soul in love and obedience, seeking further clarity and direction in honing that expression. At least that is the design…
*Accompanying music for this post is “Lost in My Mind” by The Head and the Heart. Give this song a listen by scrolling to the top right side of the blog to find it in the accompanying music.
The Head and the Heart, Lost in My Mind